Is Islam a Religion Composed of Borrowings from Judaism and Christianity?

The argument that the content of the Qur’an is composed of borrowings from other religious and historical texts is proposed as a generally accepted truth by some radical enemies of Islam.

Names located to this claim in Turkey are Turan Dursun, İlhan Arsel and some others like them.

We leave them with their own ignorance because any effort to prove that claims of these names are nothing but unscientific libel motivated by hostility will be attributing them importance.)

And within foreign scholars, while there exist some orientalists who may be taken seriously to some extend in some issues such as Arthur Jeffery, Richard Bell; there are many unqualified and prejudiced writers who get involved the discussions. In this piece, I will examine an argument from the book

The Truth about Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion

by Robert Spencer[1], who is promoted as “New York Times Best Selling Author” as an example of prejudiced approach.[2]

According to the author of the book, [the Prophet] Muhammad composed the scripture of the Qur’an with borrowings from religions such as Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism, and Hinduism.)

Here is one of the examples that the writer claims to be “borrowed from Judaism”:

The verse 32 of Surah Mâidah is taken from Mishnah, Sanhedrin 37a (iv-5).

As it is known, one of the two sons of Adam, who killed the other unjustly, is quoted from verse 32 following Mâidah 5:27-31:

مِنْ أَجْلِ ذَلِكَ كَتَبْنَا عَلَى بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ أَنَّهُ مَنْ قَتَلَ نَفْسًا بِغَيْرِ نَفْسٍ أَوْ فَسَادٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ فَكَأَنَّمَا قَتَلَ النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا وَمَنْ أَحْيَاهَا فَكَأَنَّمَا أَحْيَا النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا (…)

The English translation of the verse which the “bestseller author” prefers –and which we also consider proper– is as follows:

5/32. We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person –unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land– it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people… (p. 49)

The author asserts that this verse of the Qur’an is borrowed from Judaism claiming that it is exactly same with the expressions in the Mishnah, one of the sacred texts of Judaism. He quotes the text from Mishnah, Sanhedrin 37a (iv-5) that he claims to be the same with the verse 5:32 as follows:

… Man was created single in order to show that to him who kills single individual it shall be reckoned that he has slain the whole race, but to him who preserves the life of a single individual it is counted that he hath preserved the whole race (p. 50).

Indeed, the meaning in these statements corresponds with the meaning of the verse 32 of Mâidah. However, when we refer to the source quoted by the author, we encounter a serious falsification in the English translation. The official Hebrew text, which is approved by the Jewish religious authorities,  of Mishna, Sanhedrin 37a (4:5/J,K), which is used by the author is as follows;

(…) לְפִיכָךְ נִבְרָא אָדָם יְחִידִי לְלַמֶּדְךָ שֶׁכָּל הַמְאַבֵּד נֶפֶשׁ אַחַת מִיִּשְׂרָאֵל מַעֲלֶה עָלָיו הַכָּתוּב כְּאִלּוּ אִבֵּד עוֹלָם מָלֵא. וְכָל הַמְקַיֵּם נֶפֶשׁ אַחַת מִיִּשְׂרָאֵל מַעֲלֶה עָלָיו הַכָּתוּב כְּאִלּוּ קִיֵּם עוֹלָם מָלֵא.

Here are the four different translations of this official text made by Jewish authorities;

Soncino translation:

For this reason was man created alone, to teach thee that whosoever destroys a single soul of Israel, scripture imputes [guilt] to him as though he had destroyed a complete world; and whosoever preserves a single soul of Israel, scripture ascribes [merit] to him as though he had preserved a complete world.[3]

Herbert Danby translation:

Therefore but a single man was created in the world, to teach that if any man has caused a single soul to perish from Israel Scripture imputes it to him as though he had caused a whole world to perish; and if any man saves alive a single soul from Israel Scripture imputes it to him as though he had saved alive a whole world.

Michael L. Rodkinson translation:

Therefore the man was created singly, to teach that he who destroys one soul of a human being, the Scripture considers him as if he should destroy a whole world, and him who saves one soul of Israel, the Scripture considers him as if he should save a whole world.[4]

Jacob Neusner translation:

4:5J. Therefore man was created alone, (1) to teach that whoever destroys a single Israelite soul is deemed by scripture as if he had destroyed a whole World. K. And whoever saves a single Israelite soul is deemed by scripture as if he had saved a whole World.[5]

And this translation of the four texts in Turkish can be done in the following way:

Bu sebepten insan (İbranice ‘Adam’) tek başına yaratıldı: Kim İsrail’den (İsrailli) bir nefsi öldürürse Kutsal Kitap tarafından bütün insanlığı (‘âlemi’) öldürmüş addedileceğini, kim de İsrail’den (İsrailli) bir nefsin hayatını kurtarırsa bütün insanlığı (‘âlemi’) kurtarmış sayılacağını sana öğretmek için.

It is obvious that the words “from Israel (=me-Yisrâel)”, which take place twice in both official Mishnah text and generally accepted English translations, are dismissed in Spencer’s text. That means, Spencer manipulates the meaning by excluding a critical word of the text in his translation making clear his dishonest approach. In this way, he attempts to conceal a falsification motivated by a racist mindset and brings the text close to the true meaning stated in the Qur’an. In other words, he manipulates the translation to conceal a crucial falsification of Jews and proposes that the verse 5:32 of Qur’an is borrowed from Mishnah, and thereby from Judaism.

This attitude is an example of a dishonesty that attempts to conceal the racist falsification of Jews over the revelation of Allah, and is a modern, illustrious documentary showing how they are falsifying texts with impunity.

Who is borrowing from whom?

The expressions, “We revealed to the Children of Israel”, in the verse 5:32 of the Qur’an, are not included in the text of the present Torah (or Tanakh), even with a close meaning. This means that this verse, which was once revealed to the Children of Israel, was removed from the sacred in a later period. A text with a close meaning with this verse was imported to the sacred(!) Mishnah, written after 1500 years after Prophet Moses with a racist manipulation.

This revelation, which had previously been revealed to the Children of Israel in Hebrew, is now revealed again in Arabic in its original meaning, with the verse of Mâidah 32 to the last Prophet Muhammad (Pbuh). Therefore, Qur’an revealed once again a verse of Torah, which was excluded from the sacred text of Judaism first and implemented to the agglomerated text, Mishnah, 1500 years later with the expression “me-Yisrâel”, by correcting it.

Does this situation document a ‘plagiarism’ or an evidence of the Jews’ forgery?

Muslims consider the correspondence between the Qur’anic text, which they do not have any doubt on its authenticity, and the previous scriptures “the re-revelation of divine truths” on the basis they all originate from the one God.

In conclusion, what is original in this matter is the statements in the Qur’an; not the expressions in the sacred(!) Mishnah or Talmud, which were written 1500 years after the Torah!…

[1] Robert Spencer, The Truth About Muhammed – Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion, Washington, 2006.

[2] İbid, p. 48-50

[3] The Babilonian Talmud, Seder Nezikin, Vol. III, Translated by Rabbi Dr I. Epstein, The Soncino Press, London, p.234.

[4] New Edition of the Babylonian Talmud, Section Jurisprudence (Damages),  Tract Sanhedrin, by Michael Rodkinson, Volumes VII and VIII (XV and XVI), 1902 New York, p.111.

[5] Jacob Neusner, The Mishnah: a new translation, Yale University Press, London 1988, p. 591.

Bunları da sevebilirsiniz

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir